Compelling, credible, recent, direct impact data
After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future.
 
Co-founder Victoria Martin is pleased to see this work continue under Wits' leadership. Victoria knows that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction.
 
We honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades. Meanwhile, La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA) continues independently at cila.comminitcila.com and is linked with The CI Global site.
Time to read
less than
1 minute
Read so far

Differences in the use of family planning methods by adolescent females according to the education model utilized during pregnancy. Monterrey, Mexico.

0 comments

Núñez Rocha, G. M., M. d. J. Alanís Alanís, et al. (2005). "Differences in the use of family planning methods by adolescent females according to the education model utilized during pregnancy. Monterrey, Mexico. / Diferencias en la utilización de métodos de planificación familiar por mujeres adolescentes en Monterrey, México, según el modelo de educación sanitaria utilizado." Revista Española de Salud Pública 79(1): 69-77.

Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted to compare the use of family planning methods during the immediate postpartum period and 2 years following childbirth among adolescent females who had followed 2 different educational programmes during their pregnancies. 62 pregnant adolescents in Monterrey, Mexico, were selected and divided into 2 intervention groups: the PRECEDE model and Health Belief model (MCS) groups. Non-parametrical statistical tests were employed and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated.

Results: The average points for knowledge in the MCS and PRECEDE groups were 69.12 (95% CI: 63.27-74.79) and 49.39 (95% CI: 71.12-79.38) before the intervention, and 89.71 (95% CI: 86.24-93.17) and 75.25 (95% CI: 71.12-79.38) after the intervention, respectively. In the immediate postpartum, 93% (95% CI: 83.5-100) and 94.2% (95% CI: 86.3-100) of adolescents in the PRECEDE and MCS groups accepted the use of a family planning method, respectively. After 2 years, the PRECEDE strategy had a greater effect than the MCS strategy (92 vs. 72%). There was a difference between models as regards the use family planning methods 2 years following childbirth.

Conclusion: The PRECEDE programme is proposed as the education strategy for the prevention of a second pregnancy among adolescent females.

Why the focus on direct impact data?

A common challenge from policy makers, funders, community members, people directly experiencing development issues, and governments is: Demonstrate your Impact. Prove that what you are doing works. The high quality, highly credible data presented on the cards below is designed to help you answer that question for your social change, behaviour change, community engagement, communication and media for development, strategy formulation, policy engagement and funding initiatives. At this link filter the research data to your specific interests and priorities

Why a playing cards design?

There is a physical pack of cards with this data (to get a copy please request through the comment form for any card). The card approach allows for easy identification and selection of relevant direct impact data in any context. For example if talking with a donor and you need to identify proof of impact say "take a look at the 7 of Hearts". Quick access can be provided to high-quality data for many areas of your work – funding, planning, policy, advocacy, community dialogue, training, partner engagement, and more. A card deck is also engaging, easy to use and share, a conversation starter, and a resource - and they are fun and different. So we kept that design for the online images as it can serve similar purposes. 

What are the criteria for inclusion?

The impact data presented meets the following high standard for inclusion criteria:

  • Positive change or trend in a priority development issue;
  • Social change or behaviour change strategy or process;
  • Randomized Control Trial or Systematic Review methodology;
  • High quality peer review journal published;
  • Numeric impact data point
  • Published since 2010.