Compelling, credible, recent, direct impact data
As of March 15 2025, The Communication Initiative (The CI) platform is operating at a reduced level, with no new content being posted to the global website and registration/login functions disabled. (La Iniciativa de Comunicación, or CILA, will keep running.) While many interactive functions are no longer available, The CI platform remains open for public use, with all content accessible and searchable until the end of 2025. 

Please note that some links within our knowledge summaries may be broken due to changes in external websites. The denial of access to the USAID website has, for instance, left many links broken. We can only hope that these valuable resources will be made available again soon. In the meantime, our summaries may help you by gleaning key insights from those resources. 

A heartfelt thank you to our network for your support and the invaluable work you do.
Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

Impacts of GlobalConsent, a Web-Based Social Norms Edutainment Program, on Sexually Violent Behavior and Bystander Behavior Among University Men in Vietnam: Randomized Controlled Trial

0 comments
Affiliation

Emory University (Yount, Cheong, Bergenfeld, Sales, Li); Center for Creative Initiatives in Health and Population (Trang, Minh)

Date
Summary

"This project adds to the limited evidence from LMICs [low- and middle-income countries] on efficacious strategies to prevent sexual violence and promote prosocial bystander behaviors in university men."

Reviews of sexual violence prevention programmes have described the importance of bystander interventions and approaches that engage men as women's allies. However, young men are often difficult to reach and may resist participation in prevention programmes. RealConsent is an evidence-based web-delivered intervention tested among university men in the United States that uses didactic presentation of material via integrated audio, video, and infographics, along with educational entertainment. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) tested the impact of GlobalConsent, which is an adaptation of RealConsent, on sexually violent behaviour and prosocial bystander behaviour among university men in Vietnam, where sexual violence persists despite the legal reforms to address it.

RealConsent is based on formative research, social cognitive theory, social norms theory, and the bystander education model. Sexually violent behaviour is theorised to arise from the interplay of sociocontextual factors, personal factors, and behaviour. To operationalise this theory of change, programmatic features of RealConsent include gender-specific content and diverse behaviour change techniques, such as providing information and instruction on obtaining effective consent for sex and intervening safely, modeling communication and intervening behaviours, showing positive outcomes for obtaining consent, and intervening plus negative outcomes for perpetrating and not intervening, and reinforcing with positive feedback.

To adapt RealConsent for delivery to a new context, the research team followed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s 5-step process. The result was GlobalConsent, a 6-module web-based intervention whose 30-minute modules covered 6 topics: consent for sex, rape-myth beliefs and norms regarding gender roles, effective communication, alcohol and rape, victim empathy, and bystander intervention. Each module included didactic activities, interactivity, and episodes of an adapted, locally produced serial drama that modeled positive behaviours with cismale peers and cisfemale sex partners.

The researchers used a double-blind, parallel intervention versus control group design with 1:1 randomisation at 2 universities in Hanoi. A total of 793 consenting heterosexual or bisexual men aged 18-24 years who matriculated in September 2019 were enrolled and assigned randomly to GlobalConsent or a 6-module attention-control adolescent health education (AHEAD) programme. Both the programmes were delivered to computers and smartphones over 12 weeks. Self-reported sexually violent behaviours toward women in the prior 6 months and prosocial bystander behaviours in the prior year were measured at 0, 6, and 12 months.

More than 92.7% (735/793) of men in both study arms completed at least 1 programme module, and >90.2% (715/793) of men completed all 6 modules. At baseline, a notable percentage of men reported any sexually violent behaviour (GlobalConsent: 123/396, 31.1%; AHEAD: 103/397, 25.9%) in the prior 6 months. Among men receiving GlobalConsent, the odds of reporting a high level (at least 2 acts) of sexually violent behaviour at the endline were 1.3 times the odds at baseline. Among men receiving AHEAD, the corresponding odds ratio was higher, at 2.7. The odds of reporting any bystander behaviour at endline were 0.7 times the odds at baseline for GlobalConsent, and the corresponding odds ratio for AHEAD was lower, at 0.5.

Thus, this study "provides empirical support for the efficacy of a web-based edutainment approach for sexual violence prevention delivered to the computers and smartphones of students on college campuses, which may be more appealing and feasible in resource-constrained LMICs....The web-based platform and GlobalConsent delivered to computers and smartphones make wide-scale implementation with higher fidelity more feasible than in-person programs."

In conclusion: "Given the high rates of sexual violence against women, growing numbers of young men and women attaining postsecondary education, and rapid increases in access to the internet and smartphones globally, universities are ideal settings to provide novel sexual violence prevention programs during this critical developmental window, when young men are leaving home and are at increasing risk of sexually violent behavior. Evidence-based sexual violence prevention programs such as GlobalConsent, which are cost-effective, easily implemented by universities, and appealing to a diverse student population, are needed globally."

Source

JMIR Public Health Surveillance 2023;9:e35116. doi: 10.2196/35116. Image credit: iStock by Getty Images; Copyright: SamuelBrownNG; License: Licensed by JMIR

Why the focus on direct impact data?

A common challenge from policy makers, funders, community members, people directly experiencing development issues, and governments is: Demonstrate your Impact. Prove that what you are doing works. The high quality, highly credible data presented on the cards below is designed to help you answer that question for your social change, behaviour change, community engagement, communication and media for development, strategy formulation, policy engagement and funding initiatives. At this link filter the research data to your specific interests and priorities

Why a playing cards design?

There is a physical pack of cards with this data (to get a copy please request through the comment form for any card). The card approach allows for easy identification and selection of relevant direct impact data in any context. For example if talking with a donor and you need to identify proof of impact say "take a look at the 7 of Hearts". Quick access can be provided to high-quality data for many areas of your work – funding, planning, policy, advocacy, community dialogue, training, partner engagement, and more. A card deck is also engaging, easy to use and share, a conversation starter, and a resource - and they are fun and different. So we kept that design for the online images as it can serve similar purposes. 

What are the criteria for inclusion?

The impact data presented meets the following high standard for inclusion criteria:

  • Positive change or trend in a priority development issue;
  • Social change or behaviour change strategy or process;
  • Randomized Control Trial or Systematic Review methodology;
  • High quality peer review journal published;
  • Numeric impact data point
  • Published since 2010.